[William Tell]

kiryandil said: "I actually doubt that Reeves has a CCW, so going on about CCW is just a waste of everyone's time. "

I think you are probably right about Reeves.

The relevance to CCW is that the victim may well have behaved very differently if he had had a CCW and the theater had not disallowed it.

I repeat a question I asked previously about throwing popcorn in someone's face, "Who does that?"

I don't. Do you?

[Uncle Chip]

<>I repeat a question I asked previously about throwing popcorn in someone’s face, “Who does that?”<>

Your hero the shooter Curtis Reeves does that:

“He’s being charged with second degree murder. Curtis maintains that he was attacked, but in court, an attorney called Curtis’ claims “weak” due to the fact that other people in the movie theater saw him throw popcorn first”.

http://hollywoodlife.com/2014/01/14/curtis-reeves-movie-theater-shooter-five-things-to-know/

“The dispute quickly escalated. A bag of popcorn was angrily flung. It isn’t clear who threw the first kernel. Witnesses insisted it was Mr. Reeves, who, in turn, blamed Mr. Oulson.”

http://www.post-gazette.com/opinion/tony-norman/2014/01/17/Fla-shooting-case-is-theater-of-the-absurd/stories/201401170125

Please read before responding —

[kiryandil]

I repeat a question I asked previously about throwing popcorn in someone's face, "Who does that?"

Apparently, both Reeves and Oulson.

Of course, only ONE of them violated the theater rules on "no weapons", and on society's laws against murder...