Replies

If the temporal perspective at the basis is an orientation of present to past, as in we sense only those things which have occurred, temporally, then E=MC² rules the energy relationship to time and space of the equipment and the readers of same.

IF (and yes it is a big if) the speed limit of a realm of reality we have yet to sense is always above C, however, the medium of energy sensing (light and light speed) is no longer bound by the Einstein equation.

C² is not a real rate for anything in our universe, much less a reality in a continuum where things sensed must have a past-to-present orientation to be sensed. But Jesus stepped from our universe into another realm, with His body, and stepped back from thence with His body. So, there must be some spatio-temporal basis for that other realm.

Every 'thing' (as in any matter) in the physical universe of our sensing is but a pinch of energy, a twist of space, and a moment of time. The ether is the volume of time. Orientation in that volume determines ... well, I should stop there. No sense giving negative nay-bobs more to derail the thread. Re orienting can allow one to 'be' in a 'higher' continuum yet interact with our 'lower' continuum. Only Jesus has done that so far as I can discern from Biblical references.

C² is not a real rate for anything in our universe, much less a reality in a continuum where things sensed must have a past-to-present orientation to be sensed.

Indeed, dear brother in Christ! The problem is compounded by some skepticism I've come across in physics articles recently, that C is perhaps not the "speed limit of the universe."

It is beyond my competence to evaluate such matters. Just as it is beyond my competence to "prove" or "certify," by the scientific method, your observation:

But Jesus stepped from our universe into another realm, with His body, and stepped back from thence with His body. So, there must be some spatio-temporal basis for that other realm.

Because I cannot "test" this by means of the scientific method, does this fact make your statement "ipso facto" false? I STRONGLY DOUBT that.

However, I'm not driven by any need to establish the physical continuity of this realm and the next in terms of, say, an "ether," or universal quantum field, whatever. I figure there must be a Limit to how much Heaven and Earth, Spirit and Matter, can be "normalized" together.... [Which was where I got the idea of possible "category problem."]

Anyhoot, that's just to say: I don't know. Maybe I'm just dull-witted....

Please stay in touch, dear brother MHGinTN — please do keep me up with what you're working on!

Thank you so very much for your thought-provoking, penetrating essay/post !