Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Once in a while they slip the truth.
1 posted on 01/15/2014 3:03:14 PM PST by Morgana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last
To: Morgana
C'mon Supremes, let's be pro-choice and overturn Roe vs Wade and let the states decide as they did before 1973. That's the real pro-choice argument for abortion - let states regulate abortion.

I don't know why Republicans don't frame the argument as this, they'd win every time.

2 posted on 01/15/2014 3:06:57 PM PST by Extremely Extreme Extremist (15 years of FReeping! Congratulations EEE!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Morgana
I am anxious about this Free Speech decision pending at the US Supreme Court.

It sounds like the Colorado as well as the Massachusetts law may be overturned (allowing Abortion Clinics to set up a buffer zone VOIDING free speech in that area).

3 posted on 01/15/2014 3:09:59 PM PST by topher (Traditional values -- especially family values -- which have been proven over time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Morgana

Irony is so ironic.


4 posted on 01/15/2014 3:10:02 PM PST by Steely Tom (If the Constitution can be a living document, I guess a corporation can be a person.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Morgana

Any Constitution-free Zone should be thrown out, but sounds like SCOTUS is okay with them


5 posted on 01/15/2014 3:11:18 PM PST by GeronL (Extra Large Cheesy Over-Stuffed Hobbit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Morgana

They have no problem with naked feminists running into a church and throwing red paint at the altar I bet, but let someone blaspheme the leftist holy sites and No Speech Zones are okay


6 posted on 01/15/2014 3:12:46 PM PST by GeronL (Extra Large Cheesy Over-Stuffed Hobbit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Morgana

They need to get over the meme of “...blocking entrances and exits...”

It is NOT about “blocking” anything.

Having said that, I’d like to clean up the “pro-life” act we have going in Denver, that focuses on shouting HELL AND DAMNATION to already stressed out mothers.
(coming from guys who look like they just shuffled over from the rescue mission)

They need a message of love and help and a clear path to options.


7 posted on 01/15/2014 3:15:10 PM PST by G Larry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Morgana
First Sotomayor appearing to side with Catholic nuns regarding the birth control mandate and now this.Maybe...just *maybe*....the have a glimmer of decency in them.
8 posted on 01/15/2014 3:16:38 PM PST by Gay State Conservative (Osama Obama Care: A Religion That Will Have You On Your Knees!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Morgana

I wonder where Juan “Traitor” Roberts is on this one. Probably depends on whether it’s covered in the blackmail agreement or not. Sounds like Kennedy’s in the bag. Not that it really matters; I’d trade this one for the OsamaScare ruling in a nanosecond.


10 posted on 01/15/2014 3:18:02 PM PST by Still Thinking (Freedom is NOT a loophole!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Morgana

Kagan MAY understand that the abortuaries are benefitted most by unscrupulous MEN...


12 posted on 01/15/2014 3:19:45 PM PST by goodnesswins (R.I.P. Doherty, Smith, Stevens, Woods.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Morgana

http://gregbrannon.com/


13 posted on 01/15/2014 3:22:43 PM PST by JSDude1 (Defeat Hagan, elect a Constutional Conservative: Dr. Greg Brannon!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Morgana
Why has it come to this? Why do we let 9 Americans tell the rest of us what the Constitution says? The language isn't that confusing, nor is the interpretation that twisted.

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

That's it. Congress shall make no law...abridging the freedom of speech. Free speech is absolute, as is the press, peaceable assembly and petitioning the government. I don't need a bunch of politically appointed Ivy-leaguers to tell me what it means.

15 posted on 01/15/2014 3:28:02 PM PST by 1010RD (First, Do No Harm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Morgana

Perhaps it was no accident.


16 posted on 01/15/2014 3:39:58 PM PST by TigersEye (Stupid is a Progressive disease.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Morgana

Maybe not ironic. I’ve been reading numerous things saying she is authentically anti-abortion.


17 posted on 01/15/2014 3:44:24 PM PST by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Morgana

*GASP*


18 posted on 01/15/2014 3:45:31 PM PST by matginzac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Morgana

I hope your amicus brief spelled the word “statute.”


19 posted on 01/15/2014 4:06:59 PM PST by NCLaw441
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Morgana
Most disturbing about this case though is that it was not just Massachusetts defending this pro-abortion law, the Obama Administration sent its lawyers to the Supreme Court to argue that this anti-pro-life speech law in no way violated the Constitution.

Wonder what these evil scumbags are up too...?

There is an means to an end here...positive it's not a good one...

20 posted on 01/15/2014 4:23:02 PM PST by Popman ("Resistance to Tyrants is Obedience to God" - Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Morgana

One of the great mysteries of the Supreme Court is that, while some presidents want to nominate serious justices, they get ideologues; and sometimes when they want to appoint ideologues, they get serious justices. Even at that level they cannot peer into someone’s heart.

And justices do persuade each other of many things.

But imagine the surprise if one or more of the Obama justices turned out to be more reasoned than he wanted.


24 posted on 01/15/2014 4:46:22 PM PST by yefragetuwrabrumuy (There Is Still A Very Hot War On Terror, Just Not On The MSM. Rantburg.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Morgana

Can one be arrested for discussing the Red Sox on that sidewalk?


27 posted on 01/15/2014 5:02:23 PM PST by cookcounty (IRS = Internal Revenge Service.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Morgana

Probably their argument is that there is some sort of heightened possibility of violence, but in that case, there should also be restrictions on the approaches to bars and liquor stores, which in fact are much more likely to become violent scenes.


28 posted on 01/15/2014 5:06:46 PM PST by cookcounty (IRS = Internal Revenge Service.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Morgana

Speaking out against abortion in front of an abortion clinic is the definition of “fighting words” to a liberal.


29 posted on 01/15/2014 5:09:42 PM PST by VerySadAmerican (".....Barrack, and the horse Mohammed rode in on.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson