Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Pelham
"Well if Stone said it has to be true /sarc Assassination investigators had an Army specialist attempt to replicate Oswald’s 3 shots using Oswald’s rifle exactly as it was found in the Book Depository."

Are you sure about that?

2) The rifle couldn't be perfectly sighted in using the scope (i.e., thereby eliminating the above overshoot completely) without installing two metal shims (small metal plates), which were not present when the rifle arrived for testing, and were never found.[64] Frazier testified that there was "a rather severe scrape" on the scope tube, and that the sight could have been bent or damaged. He was unable to determine when the defect occurred before the FBI received the rifle and scope on November 27, 1963.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_F._Kennedy_assassination_rifle

62 posted on 01/15/2014 4:44:23 PM PST by Karl Spooner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]


To: Karl Spooner

The scope was offline but it wasn’t bad enough to keep the marksmen from hitting their targets at distances approximating Kennedy’s distance from Oswald. And it’s possible that the scope was sighted better before Oswald disposed of it in his rush to leave the Depository- the scrape on the scope tube could be a sign of that.

The rifle tests are described in this section of the Warren Report. You’ll want to read pages 444-447. It’s a PDF file. They had three men test the rifle, mostly using the scope but once with the iron sights.

http://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh3/pdf/WH3_Simmons.pdf


74 posted on 01/15/2014 7:27:39 PM PST by Pelham (Obamacare, the vanguard of Obammunism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson