Your posting history is interesting, from a psychological profile perspective. It would be interesting to read what your assertions were in the Terri Schiavo case, but I don't want to wste the time to go that far back in your ravings at FR. Besides, you will give us some yarn if it suits your thuggish purposes. Were you living in Florida when the state was starving and dehydrating Terri to death?
You claim to be a Physician (from what country have you brought your medical bona fides?), so I find it interesting that you would dismiss the possibility of a blood clot being cause by physical trauma, just to give the husband cover from my faint speculation.
As I said in this case I think the law is good that forbids the termination of life support on a pregnant woman who is brain dead. I also think it is an incredible long shot that baby will make it but it is worth that chance as the baby's life hangs in the balance. However once the baby is delivered, there is no hope for the dead mother and support should be withdrawn as she is dead. There is no hope of recovery. However to even accuse the father of causing the blood clots is irrational as this type of trauma would be very easily seen on physical diagnosis. I can't wait to hear your next uninformed opinion of how I and the rest of medical science has of wrong and you are the sole purveyor of the truth. Also please list your bona fides as you have yet to make them known.