Oh heavens, what a quandary. Fourteen weeks doesn’t sound good for that baby. Praying that all will turn out as the good lord intends.
If the baby is still viable then the father is being cruel to want it dead.
Wonder if the baby is his??? So disturbing.
Contrary to what some of the “experts” are quoted as saying, this woman is NOT “dead.” “Brain-death” is an extremely misleading term, invented by the usual suspects for there anti-life convenience.
Possibly the woman will not recover, but she is not “dead” if all her systems are working.
As for the condition of the baby, it is evidently still alive as well, although unclear in what condition. It would be wrong to kill mother and child for the husband’s convenience, although it is unknown on the evidence given whether or not either of them will survive.
God’s will be done. Prayers for them.
Erik and family will probably get millions for this to cover medical bills for the wife and lifelong problems of the baby.
I’m very curious as to why the hospital hasn’t complied with the husband’s desires. They don’t appear to be a religious hospital.
Is it really about their interpretation of the law or is there disagreement about the woman’s actual status as dead?
The hospital and staff can’t speak so their side of the story is not available.