OK, how about this...
If a Texan game warden came to my house, entered it at gunpoint without a warrant (as no warrant, and I would not let him in, which would then require force on his part), and then looked in my fridge, again without my consent or a warrant, and found something that I shouldn’t have (snail darter, endangered wood rat, whatever) and I was charged with a crime...
My defense would be the 4th Amendment to the US Constitution. If any judge denied that defense, then they too are a traitor. The Constitution would simply be an old piece of parchment at that point. Do you not agree?
Why?
Wouldn't it be more appropriate to cite Art I, Sec 9 of TX's own Constitution?