Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 01/11/2014 12:24:45 PM PST by Kevmo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: dangerdoc; citizen; Liberty1970; Red Badger; Wonder Warthog; PA Engineer; glock rocks; free_life; ..

The Cold Fusion/LENR Ping List

http://www.freerepublic.com/tag/coldfusion/index?tab=articles


http://lenr-canr.org/

Vortex-L
http://tinyurl.com/pxtqx3y


2 posted on 01/11/2014 12:25:42 PM PST by Kevmo ("A person's a person, no matter how small" ~Horton Hears a Who)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kevmo
There is another interesting article in the same journal:

How the Flawed Journal Review Process Impedes Paradigm Shifting Discoveries

3 posted on 01/11/2014 12:48:54 PM PST by kosciusko51 (Enough of "Who is John Galt?" Who is Patrick Henry?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kevmo

Thanks! 162 pages of light reading ;-)


4 posted on 01/11/2014 2:12:07 PM PST by bigbob (The best way to get a bad law repealed is to enforce it strictly. Abraham Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kevmo

From the paper:

“The authors claim to produce a source that emits approximately a few Hz, perhaps 10 Hz, 14 MeV DT neutrons.
This is a formidable source. The rate of 2.5 MeV DD neutron source should be considerably (many order
of magnitudes) stronger. Such a strong source of 2.5 and 14 MeV neutrons should be easily detectable with
live electronical [sic] neutron detector. The fact that the authors did not make an attempt to measure these
neutrons with the more reliable neutron detectors speaks volume of the less than adequate research effort.”


5 posted on 01/11/2014 2:38:53 PM PST by TexasGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kevmo

From the paper:

“The authors claim to produce a source that emits approximately a few Hz, perhaps 10 Hz, 14 MeV DT neutrons.
This is a formidable source. The rate of 2.5 MeV DD neutron source should be considerably (many order
of magnitudes) stronger. Such a strong source of 2.5 and 14 MeV neutrons should be easily detectable with
live electronical [sic] neutron detector. The fact that the authors did not make an attempt to measure these
neutrons with the more reliable neutron detectors speaks volume of the less than adequate research effort.”


6 posted on 01/11/2014 2:39:04 PM PST by TexasGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kevmo

“Even if we use the referee’s erroneous value of 2 ×107 n/cm2/hr, a
neutron dose over a two-week period of 480 REM is still far below the lethal limit of 6000 REM.”

If you get 480 REM, you will be VERY VERY sick. It speaks loads that the dudes were not monitoring.


7 posted on 01/11/2014 2:42:51 PM PST by TexasGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kevmo

“An integrated neutron radiation dose of 6 Gy is considered lethal [25]. This is equivalent to 6000 REM.b F”

Example of the fact that these guys do not know what they are talking about.


8 posted on 01/11/2014 2:46:46 PM PST by TexasGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson