Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Morgana
The problem is that declaring someone brain dead is actually a subjective call. And, when the possibility of harvesting a person's organs is in play it makes the decision suspect.

I haven't really followed this case much, but when the person in question can respond in any way, by blinking on command or attempting to smile, the person is not "brain dead."

15 posted on 01/09/2014 11:11:37 PM PST by Slyfox (We want our pre-existing HEALTH INSURANCE back!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Slyfox

Yeah...none of that is happening.

This girl died almost a month ago.


21 posted on 01/10/2014 3:49:16 AM PST by Vermont Lt (If you want to keep your dignity, you can keep it. Period........ Just kidding, you can't keep it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: Slyfox
The problem is that declaring someone brain dead is actually a subjective call

Get ready for some folks here to disagree with you and claim that the declaration of 'brain death' is clear cut. It is not.

What is considered brain dead in one location is not brain dead in another. To make matters worse, the same committee that sets the organ transplant rules is the one that sets the criteria for when a person can be declared brain dead and their organs harvested.

Just wait for the Obamacare committees get in charge. They'll be using your voting record to determine if you get to keep your organs.

32 posted on 01/10/2014 7:00:45 AM PST by ladyjane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson