Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Boogieman

No it wouldn’t solve the problem.
It only makes children pay for the selfishness of adults, same as it has ever been.

We’ve had children born out of wedlock for millennia.
This is not a new problem or one solely related to abortion.


68 posted on 01/09/2014 10:48:46 AM PST by Lorianne (fedgov, taxporkmoney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]


To: Lorianne
No it wouldn’t solve the problem.

It would improve it. Or are you insisting abortion is acceptable in lieu of a perfect solution?

It only makes children pay for the selfishness of adults, same as it has ever been.

That doesn't happen anyway?

72 posted on 01/09/2014 11:04:19 AM PST by papertyger ("refusing to draw an inescapable conclusion does not qualify as a 'difference of opinion.'")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies ]

To: Lorianne

“No it wouldn’t solve the problem.
It only makes children pay for the selfishness of adults, same as it has ever been.”

Wouldn’t solve the problem, but it would greatly alleviate it. The system we have now subsidized unmarried pregancies, and what happens when you subsidize something? You get more of it. Remove the financial incentive, and a large part of the problem goes away as women would naturally look out for their own interests.

Would some children pay? Yes, unfortunately. However, a lot more children will suffer being born into broken homes, and all that entails, if we fail to enact some sensible solution like this.


80 posted on 01/09/2014 2:50:47 PM PST by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson