Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Girlene
So, technically he had 100 percent say on whether there was an abortion of his child.

Bull!

The woman has several months to decide if she wants to be a parent, and you have the gall to equate that to the man deciding before he even has relations with her?

Twisted.

34 posted on 01/09/2014 8:28:07 AM PST by papertyger ("refusing to draw an inescapable conclusion does not qualify as a 'difference of opinion.'")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]


To: papertyger

You can’t argue with science. There would never have been a child had he not had sex.

A man should know that he is taking the chance of a pregnancy or an abortion unless he or the woman is unable to conceive a child. In the instance of a married man, he shouldn’t have to consider this (although it still happens).

I’m not sure why you are so hostile to what I wrote.


44 posted on 01/09/2014 8:53:17 AM PST by Girlene (Hey, NSA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson