You, however, have no downside to your ruminations. The issues in her suit are quite specific, and have corroboration from others, including the builder and the subcontractor that now refuses to do this guy's landscaping.
“The issues in her suit are quite specific, and have corroboration from others, including the builder and the subcontractor that now refuses to do this guy’s landscaping.”
As you should well know that there has been statements that a landscaping company employ had admitted to harassing him.
That would imply that they was refusing to do his landscaping out of spite for the charges against one of their employees. That would indicate that the landscaping company and developer were in breach of contract. If it was me, you can dang well bet I would be in that office raising hell about it. But when the friend/family of the law structure in the town are against you, you won’t even get off of square one when taking legal action against them. And it has been indicated that she is relation to people in the legal system in that area.
I have seen what people in that situation have gone through. It’s a no win situation. Any complaints the person has, will go nowhere. The court system won’t even accept the cases, while the people connected with the legal system can slander as much as they want, and file as many baseless cases as they want with no fear of reprisal.
At this point, nothing I have seen has indicated to me that anything either side has said is anything more than rantings of delusional lunatics.
She didn’t sue the neighbor, just the realtor. She never even called the cops on him from the article.
The worst that can happen to her is that she’ll have to pay her legal fees.
At best she’ll win damages etc.
As someone said above “You can’t win if you don’t play!”, she’s facing a small cost versus a large payout.
I think she’s just fluffy-headed and not venal, but who knows.