To: Rummyfan
The battle of Leyte Gulf is famous for the "crossing of the T" in which US forces caught Japanese forces in single file, transiting the Surigao Straits. We were able to pluck many of those ships off, one by one. Our ships could fire abeam; the Japanese ships could only fire ahead, and their fire was limmited. But this tactic is ancient. Ships of sail did the same thing.
With modern guided missiles and air capabilities, crossing the T, as well as having big, heavy battleships to put shells on-target is not cost-effective.
19 posted on
01/06/2014 1:32:26 PM PST by
Lou L
(Health "insurance" is NOT the same as health "care")
To: Lou L
A lot of that was due to US development of radar, and Japanese ignorance of it.
29 posted on
01/06/2014 1:36:20 PM PST by
gura
(If Allah is so great, why does he need fat sexually confused fanboys to do his dirty work? -iowahawk)
To: Lou L
“Crossing the T” only makes sense if the opposing Navy is utilizing “Line Ahead” tactical formation. Nobody does that anymore. Battle Groups are dispersed over a wide area. Even in the Age of Sail a smart commander (Nelson at the Nile & Nelson again at Trafalgar) could violate the expected tactical arrangement and win a stunning victory.
Anyhow, Surigao was a satisfying victory for the old Battleships that were raised from the mud of Pearl Harbor. They got to perform their principal design task — knocking the stuffing out of a line of opposing Battleships & Heavy Cruisers.
57 posted on
01/06/2014 2:01:02 PM PST by
Tallguy
(between taglines...)
To: Lou L
Nelson did the same thing at Trafalgar.Devestating effects in both battles.
87 posted on
01/06/2014 4:20:57 PM PST by
HANG THE EXPENSE
(Life's tough.It's tougher when you're stupid.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson