Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Sir Napsalot

I think a naval engagement of the future will be at close ranges. Why? Radar counter detection invariable leads to EMCOM - emissions control being enforced. Targeting will be via satellite and final targeting visual, that’s right visual. The old saying is radiate and die. Radar is suicide, same with active sonar.


17 posted on 01/06/2014 1:31:40 PM PST by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: central_va
Targeting will be via satellite and final targeting visual, that’s right visual.

I find your post a little contradictory. You make some good points, but if you could target with satellites or aircraft (even drones), why wouldn't you fire from long distances, rather than make your platform more vulnerable by closing in?

27 posted on 01/06/2014 1:35:59 PM PST by Lou L (Health "insurance" is NOT the same as health "care")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: central_va
The old saying is radiate and die. Radar is suicide, same with active sonar.

For any non-military FReepers who may be scratching their heads over that, compare it to hiding in the woods, while someone looks for you using a flashlight. You can see the flashlight long before it can illuminate you!

80 posted on 01/06/2014 3:36:06 PM PST by JimRed (Excise the cancer before it kills us; feed & water the Tree of Liberty! TERM LIMITS NOW & FOREVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson