Posted on 01/02/2014 7:25:43 AM PST by knarf
You used to SIT on me ?
You're welcome
CC
Thank you, thank you, thank you
LOL!
You misspelled “retarted”... and usually it’s “retarted, sir”....
So I need to press the bell for pick up is and delivery is?
Glass houses.
Im one of a very few In America who doesnt even own a TV so I seldom see any modern TV ads.
The bastardization of the language is what has allowed the LEFT to so deftly reframe almost everything they choose to redefine to meet their needs.
the use of SO may or may not be fallout from that process but it fits well into todays stilted slang driven communications...
so...fer shure
I have been in so many places where people can’t think past 140 letters - the maximum allowed Tweet.
And these people vote. Three times. In the same precinct.
huked awn fonix werked fer mee!
Cee Cee
Total presence breaks on the univocal predication of the exterior absolute the absolute existent (of that of which it is not possible to univocally predicate an outside, while the equivocal predication of the outside of the absolute exterior is possible of that of which the reality so predicated is not the reality, viz., of the dark/of the self, the identity of which is not outside the absolute identity of the outside, which is to say that the equivocal predication of identity is possible of the self-identity which is not identity, while identity is univocally predicated of the limit to the darkness, of the limit of the reality of the self).
This is the real exteriority of the absolute outside: the reality of the absolutely unconditioned absolute outside univocally predicated of the dark: the light univocally predicated of the darkness: the shining of the light univocally predicated of the limit of the darkness: actuality univocally predicated of the other of self-identity: existence univocally predicated of the absolutely unconditioned other of the self. The precision of the shining of the light breaking the dark is the other-identity of the light.
The precision of the absolutely minimum transcendence of the dark is the light itself/the absolutely unconditioned exteriority of existence for the first time/the absolutely facial identity of existence/the proportion of the new creation sans depth/the light itself ex nihilo: the dark itself univocally identified, i.e., not self-identity identity itself equivocally, not the dark itself equivocally, in “self-alienation,” not “self-identity, itself in self-alienation” “released” in and by “otherness,” and “actual other,” “itself,” not the abysmal inversion of the light, the reality of the darkness equivocally, absolute identity equivocally predicated of the self/selfhood equivocally predicated of the dark (the reality of this darkness the other-self-covering of identity which is the identification person-self).
The connection of univocal is broken by the absolute, as also the relationship of absolute (modified by univocal and subsidized by absolute) is realized
You're welcome
I was just playing along. You did not sound unhinged to me. It bothers me too.
Holy mackerel, dere Andy!
Wow. It makes so much more sense now that you formatted it. LOL
Ah think it’s Holy Mack’ul ... but ...OK
Thank you. I now know the definitive meaning of life without having to make the mandatory trip to the Himalayas to seek enlightenment from the old man who lives in a cave. Obviously you have already made that trip and brought his profound wisdom back to your humble followers.
Happy New Year.
Laz is like, y’know ... so ... um ....
The left’s ideological father was the very first entity to make an attack on the language, twisting and questioning the clear meaning of “you will die”.
Usually without even knowing they voted at all!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.