Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: cloudmountain
It's been a long time since I watched newscasts so I was struck by how many "bouncy" females are doing the news these days after watching those videos. Definitely being eye-candy is a requirement for the job. When I was growing up in the 1970s, the newscasts were dominated by men and they tended to be solemn and humorless. Even the weather forecasters in those days were pretty serious affairs with meteorologists in thick glasses who truly looked like they spent 14 hours a day poring over NOAA weather maps. Now the weather has become entertainment as well, with luscious females who probably couldn't tell you the different between a high and low pressure system.
5 posted on 01/01/2014 7:21:11 AM PST by SamAdams76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: SamAdams76
It's been a long time since I watched newscasts so I was struck by how many "bouncy" females are doing the news these days after watching those videos. Definitely being eye-candy is a requirement for the job. When I was growing up in the 1970s, the newscasts were dominated by men and they tended to be solemn and humorless. Even the weather forecasters in those days were pretty serious affairs with meteorologists in thick glasses who truly looked like they spent 14 hours a day poring over NOAA weather maps. Now the weather has become entertainment as well, with luscious females who probably couldn't tell you the different between a high and low pressure system.

Notice that there ARE male announcers of all ages and looks. However, all the females are young, pretty and bouncy. They are of all colors too. When I see an old, not-pretty, not-bouncy female announcer, then I will note parity in gender.

Women (and I am one) are SUCH hypocrites. "Wah, I wanna be an announcer!!!"
Then the field opens up and what women get hired? Hah, HYPOCRISY.
Women want to see young, pretty and bouncy too cuz they somehow identify with them. Men drool while the young women announcers simper, smirk and grin with their $25,000. tooth job.

Those women don't know the news and they don't care. They know their value--sex...absolutely NOTHING else.

Well, those bouncy boobs will sag in their not too distant future.
Their toothy grins will become yellowish and need LOTS of cleaning.
Their smirks will turn to frowns when they turn 40 and NOBODY wants them in front of the T.V. camera anymore. They will be BITTER and blame EVERYONE else on the planet but their own determination to get what they wanted, using their looks, their sex.

The cream of the jest is that MANY producers and such, those who PUT THEM in front of the camera are....women. Hah! Their own gender sells them down the river.
Payback is such a bitch. :o) I wouldn't want to hear their moaning and groaning when they reach the age of unreasoning rage at becoming old. They WILL write letters about having "real" women on T.V. Hah, too little, too late, dearies.

Excuse me! Your boobs are knocking over my soda. Move on, fatso saggy-tits old lady.

Oh dear, am I being harsh???

15 posted on 01/01/2014 7:55:02 PM PST by cloudmountain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson