Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: fieldmarshaldj

AFAIC, Dick Van Dyke stole the whole show!

Mary Poppins was unbearable; the kids were saccharin-sweet; the Dad was a no-go.

Without Dick and the chimney sweeps, it would have been a total wash.

And now, in the 21st century, they’ve made another boring movie about the original boring movie???

I will never understand Hollywood.


100 posted on 01/02/2014 5:05:37 PM PST by miserare (2014--The Year We Fight Back! (Thanks, Phil Robertson.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies ]


To: miserare

Wow, that’s two people that actually dislike Mary Poppins. I would also strongly disagree about your assessment of the father. Both parents were largely ignoring their children and foisting them off on the nanny, the father concerned about his career at the bank, the mother concerned about her political activism. I think that was a highly realistic portrayal and by the end of the film, had the parents realizing how important it was to bond with the children (as Bert’s song said, (before) it was too late). Both David Tomlinson and Glynnis Johns were magnificent in their portrayals, as were the children. Certainly eons better than the “dumb dads” and mouthy kids we see portrayed today.


101 posted on 01/03/2014 6:08:05 AM PST by fieldmarshaldj (Resist We Much)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson