Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: JoeDetweiler

If you read the snopes article, it says ‘false’ then it goes on to validate all of the salient points in the article.

The links in the article are to a CBS interview and those ARE direct quotes.

Here’s what pisses me off: I posted this on my FB feed. I got responses citing the snopes article, but it goes like this:

My article says that 8 percent of the girls reporting had serious complications or death.

Snopes says FALSE! 92% of the girls reporting had *no*serious* complications.

The link validates *everything* that the article said.


77 posted on 12/31/2013 1:28:06 PM PST by Marie (When are they going to take back Obama's peace prize?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: Marie

Sigh...did you read the part of the Snopes article that says....

“Although this information is accurate in a strictly literal sense, it is a misleading presentation of raw data that does not in itself establish a causal connection between Gardasil and the posited medical dangers.”

And did you see where the CDC says....

“None of these adverse events were found to be any more common after HPV vaccination than among the comparison groups.”


79 posted on 12/31/2013 5:56:49 PM PST by JoeDetweiler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson