I don’t need to be an expert to see that the benefits of a nuclear power plant are not worth the risk. Fukushima is verification of the bad economics of nuclear. I understand from your comment that your personal economics may have a vested interest in the nuke industry. That does not give your opinion much weight politically these days. If your opinion counted, San Onofre would be firing up instead of decommissioned.
Question, can we store the waste from San Onofre in you garage seeing as how it is safe?
Finally, using curse words is not a substitute for legitimate debate. I sympathize with your frustration but do hope we can hold to FR standards. Or should I look for a mod to decommission your post?
My dad was one of the start-up engineers on San Onofre NGS One. I have lived my life since 1965 near nuclear power plants- much safer than most other places.
There is absolutely no reason to store nuclear waste. It should be recycled and used as fuel in other nuclear facilities. It was President Jimmy Carter who screwed that up; now we argue over storing it, when there was a perfectly adequate solution provided by Bechtel Engineering around 1970.
Bovine excrement. (Is that better? Still describes your post very well.) You know nothing. There is no stream of radiation pouring out of Fukushima, polluting the west coast of North America.
Even more than curse words, FR hates liars. You should be more careful who you go after.