Don't they have editors that decide what to publish and what to cut?
If Robertson is guilty of anything then gq is even more so.
...and just what is it that gq is supposed to be guilty of?
They’re supposed to censor what he said so faggots aren’t offended?
Not their job.
This is a fairly well written piece, again, not a hit job.
If the faggots can’t handle it, they need to get back in the closet.
Then you haven’t read the actual article. It was actually decent. It was well-written and fair and had no “gotcha” intent. It was interesting for what it was.
A few lines were taken from it (that had nothing wrong with them to begin with) for fake homo outrage. GQ did nothing wrong. They actually got it right for publishing a decent article and keeping Phil’s words in complete context.
Homo-loving A&E is trying to stir up controversy where none exists.