Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: ladyjane

Actually, I found the opposite: Top-loaders with mechanical agitators tended to put a lot more stress on my clothing than the tumbling action of my front-loader. My jeans in particular lasted longer when washed in the FL than the TL. Pant legs and socks in particular have the opportunity to get wrapped around the base of the agitator under the plastic paddle, and get torn up. The front-loader has nothing for them to snag on.


86 posted on 12/16/2013 9:55:20 PM PST by Little Pig (Vi Veri Veniversum Vivus Vici.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]


To: Little Pig

I’m thinking it’s the low water level that is damaging the fabric. Even in the front loader my clothes get twisted and worn - yes, pant legs in particular but also sleeves.

My solution is to use the delicate setting and add a lot more water. A lot. It’s extra work but I want the clothes to smell clean. I use a little borax too and give them an extra rinse.

BTW, I know someone in clothing manufacturing who said they know the new low water machines destroy the fabric but there’s not a lot they can do. People will just buy more clothing.


96 posted on 12/17/2013 6:49:22 AM PST by ladyjane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson