We've been hearing that such is a year or two away for many years. I'll believe it when it happens. Until then, the history of this field lends itself to honest skepticism.
And pointing out your ignorance on the subject does not constitute an attack.
Calling people names does, such as referring to someone as a moron on that post of yours that got pulled.
Like I said, when I see a truly viable prototype with scalability to commercial levels, I'll start believing this. Until then, it reeks of flim-flam artist.
But I'll bet not as many years as the "hot fusion" boys have been promising.
"Until then, the history of this field lends itself to honest skepticism."
What history?? Other than Rossi, all the work has been done by qualified scientists at acknowledged research organizations.
"Like I said, when I see a truly viable prototype with scalability to commercial levels, I'll start believing this. Until then, it reeks of flim-flam artist.
So your sole criterion for "truth" is "commercial success"?? Kind of limited vision, I would say. All scientific evidence is to be ignored until there is a commercial product?? See "hot fusion" above.