Here is some critical thinking: she was alone with the dogs, and they aren’t telling what she was doing.
Part of my point.
I note that there is crap all information in the "article", that everyone rushes to their conclusions. But, because the dog involved is a pit bull, I will be castigated for suggesting that people actually should have a bare minimum of facts before going berserk.
IOW, the point I am making is NOT about the dog. It's about all the times people here go off full blast based on minimal information. I've seen the same thing on any number of hot button subjects. That's what I mean by critical thinking. Take the words pit bull out of this 5 line piece of sterling journalism and most of the posters in this thread would be saying, not enough info.