Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Zeneta

The information about the bubble is interesting but I disagree with him as to his conclusion. “Journalistic ethics” did not “get us through the last century”. In fact, “journalistic Ethics” of the last 50 years acted against America’s interests in a radical and destructive way.

“Algorithmic gatekeepers” programmed to apply neo-”journalistic ethics” are much scarier than ones designed to cater to our personal interests — and more scary even than ones designed to steer us towards specific advertisers or services.

Who decides what is “important”, “challenging” or even “different”? I trust Zuckerberg’s judgment on those things even LESS than I trust his judgment as to what my usage indicates would be of interest to me.


33 posted on 12/07/2013 2:52:23 PM PST by BenLurkin (This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]


To: BenLurkin

Yes.

But as he said, he is a Liberal.

This issue is certainly not about you or me.

It is about the folks that won’t watch an hour long presentation or read something more than a quarter page.

They are, the Google’s and Yahoo’s of the world are pushing people into a box out of convenience.

I’m not sure about your experience over the years using MS Windows, for example.

The operating system and user interface has progressively attempted to “HELP ME”.

It/they “assume” what I want to do, and try to make that easier for me.

Automatically.

I hate it.

It drives me mad.


34 posted on 12/07/2013 3:13:12 PM PST by Zeneta
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson