I’ll take “correlation does not necessarily equal causation”, for the win.
The article was a good piece of satire though, especially in it’s use of such terms as “active ingredient”. Which one exactly? THC or CBD? Did someone actually get paid to write this?
Despite there being little evidence, the author puts your chance of developing b@tch tits as “probably”. I find it highly amusing that a 1972 study was quoted but not the one from the National Commission on Marihuana and Drug Abuse that favored ending prohibition. Nixon, the spawn of satan he was, even tried to interfere once word got out his little study wasn’t going the way he planned. More sound judgement from the wise and honorable Richard M. Nixon.
So you believe all government reports and studies? Like those originating from the likes of Valerie Plame and her husband, or any of hundreds of government sponsored research on man-made global warming affirming the West as being the reason temperatures on Mars are increasing? How about government affiliated figures like Bill Ayers and Nadil Hasan?
Plenty of fifth column agents working on the public dole and they don't always have the same objective in mind or objectivity in their research.