Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug - review
theguardian.com ^ | Friday 6 December 2013 22.17 GMT | Peter Bradshaw

Posted on 12/06/2013 3:31:21 PM PST by BenLurkin

eter Jackson has picked up the pace. He began his Hobbit trilogy at an amiable, meanderingly wayward canter, and tried the patience of believers and non-believers alike with that initial supper scene, almost an epic in itself. But this second episode commences with a narrative whipcrack – a quick flashback to Gandalf and Thorin tensely discussing their great plan in the snug bar of the Prancing Pony – and then we're off, at a tremendous gallop.

The Desolation of Smaug is a cheerfully entertaining and exhilarating adventure tale, a supercharged Saturday morning picture: it's mysterious and strange and yet Jackson also effortlessly conjures up that genial quality that distinguishes The Hobbit from the more solemn Rings stories. The absurdity is winning: you're laughing with, not laughing at. For me, it never sagged once in its mighty two hour 40 minutes running time and the high-frame-rate projection for this film somehow looks richer and denser than it did the last time around. Maybe I'm just getting used to it. Jackson has shown that he is an expert in big-league popular movie-making to rival Lucas and Spielberg. His Smaug, with its fight scenes, chase spectaculars, creepy creatures and secret stone doors opening with a grinding noise, is something to set alongside the Indiana Jones films.

(Excerpt) Read more at theguardian.com ...


TOPICS: TV/Movies; The Hobbit Hole
KEYWORDS: desolationofsmog; movies; smaug; thehobbit
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-50 next last

1 posted on 12/06/2013 3:31:21 PM PST by BenLurkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
I tried "high frame rate" the last time around, and I feel it very much detracted from the movie going experience.

When I go to the movies, I want to be caught up in a story. High Frame Rate makes me caught up in a set, in makeup, in feeling like I'm pushed around in a wheelbarrow through something fake. It feels like looking at a full-motion diorama.

2 posted on 12/06/2013 3:38:19 PM PST by Yossarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

I haven’t seen the second one yet, but the first was mostly a snoozer. He should probably have cut this down to two films, max. Not everything has to be a trilogy, it’s getting ridiculous.


3 posted on 12/06/2013 3:38:58 PM PST by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Yossarian

I just couldn’t get past what a bad movie the first one was.


4 posted on 12/06/2013 3:39:10 PM PST by BenLurkin (This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

I can’t take three movies for one book.


5 posted on 12/06/2013 3:40:29 PM PST by Fledermaus (If we here in TN can't get rid of the worthless Lamar, it's over.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Boogieman

The Hobbit is not a long book. There is no reason in the world why a movie picture adaptation should exceed 120 minutes. Total.


6 posted on 12/06/2013 3:40:37 PM PST by BenLurkin (This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

If they took out all the walking it would only be 30 minutes long.


7 posted on 12/06/2013 3:45:23 PM PST by mad_as_he$$
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

What? BenLurkin because you’re afraid that people will find out how terrible your taste in movies is? Just saying.


8 posted on 12/06/2013 3:45:55 PM PST by FreedomStar3028 (Evil must be punished.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

I liked it quite a bit.


9 posted on 12/06/2013 3:53:34 PM PST by chris37 (Heartless.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Boogieman

I disagree. While Peter Jackson should have included only relevant background material in the Hobbit, it should be as long as it needs to be.

In the Hobbit’s case, three movies might have been too much, but it certainly would have needed two movies to tell the whole story.


10 posted on 12/06/2013 3:58:49 PM PST by Jonty30 (What Islam and secularism have in common is that they are both death cults)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: FreedomStar3028

You can call me Ben, Newbie.


11 posted on 12/06/2013 3:59:02 PM PST by BenLurkin (This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Boogieman

I haven’t seen the first one. If it’s that bad, then maybe Jackson should’ve done a “scouring of the Shire” in its place.


12 posted on 12/06/2013 4:07:07 PM PST by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

I did see the first installment of “The Hobbit”. I enjoyed it; found the storytelling, acting, cinematography engaging throughout.

IMO, if someone found it boring, the problem is elsewhere than the film itself ...


13 posted on 12/06/2013 4:09:32 PM PST by NorthMountain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Some of us like to wallow in our fantasy. TLOTR brushed over too many potential stories for me. Eight long movies for Harry Potter seemed rushed to me. ;-)


14 posted on 12/06/2013 4:09:36 PM PST by JimSEA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

I loathed the farce of the dwarves running around in the goblin cave.


15 posted on 12/06/2013 4:10:01 PM PST by heartwood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

I loved LOTR Trilogy but was very disappointed there was no scouring. Nearly my favorite part of the books.


16 posted on 12/06/2013 4:13:18 PM PST by jimmyray
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

There are some great bits in the first one - some bits did seem superfluous like the mountain battle or whatever it was called and it pretty well jumped the with shark with some of the action stuff in the Goblin Kings cave. It is not LOTR and does not try to be - it is far more lighthearted. The Desolation of Smaulg doesn’t come out here until the day after Christmas - looking forward to it!


17 posted on 12/06/2013 4:14:54 PM PST by melsec (Once a Jolly Swagman camped by a Billabong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Olog-hai

It has it’s moments, it’s just bloated, like they stretched it out to fill up a trilogy. The last hour is worth waiting for though, if you can make it.


18 posted on 12/06/2013 4:16:18 PM PST by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Boogieman

How ironic. Somebody complaining about trilogies when it comes to works of Tolkien.


19 posted on 12/06/2013 4:19:20 PM PST by Usagi_yo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

“The Desolation of Smaug”
What is a Smaug?


20 posted on 12/06/2013 4:19:52 PM PST by minnesota_bound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-50 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson