If the problem with “liberal” scholarship (the name itself suggests the fallacy that guides the work) is that a flimsy, fact-free, wordless Jesus could be a magician, a bandit, an eschatologist, a radical, a mad prophet, a sane one, a tax revolutionary, a reforming rabbi (anything but Jesus the son of God)–the mythical Jesus could be Hercules, Osiris, Mithras, a Pauline vision, a Jewish fantasy, a misremembered amalgam of folk tales, a rabbi’s targum about Joshua. In short–the mirror image of the confusion that the overtheoretical and under-resourced history of the topic had left strewn in the field. If the scarecrows concocted by the liberals were made from rubble, the mythtic Jesuses were their shadows. If the bad boys of the Jesus Seminar had effectively declared that the evidence to hand means Jesus can be anything you want him to be, there is some justice in the view that Jesus might be nothing at all.
Stars have to be large enough to give off light in order to be seen. That size is larger than Jupiter. The geosynchronos orbit distance is less than the radius of Jupiter. That means that, no, there can be no geosynchronos star.
Glad I could help you with that.
Don that was quite a series of invective. Irrational rantings.
Be honest are you a Satanist? Or did some priest, rabbi or pastor do you wrong somewhere in your life? It is one thing to be a skeptic, yet another to broil in anger and hatred. Perhaps you should take a powder for a bit.