Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: TheThirdRuffian
Apparently this killed 95% of the North American population before Europeans even showed up.

Can you elaborate? I thought the great die-off was the product of the disease wave unleashed after European contact. Disease travelled much faster than exploration and settlement, so Indians across North America were dying en masse long before whites showed up in their vicinity. Absent the germ theory of disease, no one at the time connected the dots but the European origin of the epidemic is clear to us today.

But I've never heard of a 95% die-out prior to first contact.

9 posted on 12/03/2013 7:49:48 PM PST by sphinx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: sphinx
No. Not prior to first contact. The first explorers and conquistadores ALL reported large populations and village after village. A generation later the reports were of villages with remains of the dead all about and empty land. In all the Americas it was the same.

1491 - Charles C. Mann

The apparent hantavirus dieoff occurred a bit later than the first years and equally devastating though limited probably to Mexico and is theorized but quite possible.

12 posted on 12/04/2013 5:10:31 AM PST by ThanhPhero (Khách sang La Vang hanh huong tham vieng Maria)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: sphinx

Here, first google hit:

http://www.examiner.com/article/apocalypic-mysterious-plague-killed-millions-of-native-americans-the-1500s


15 posted on 12/04/2013 7:45:41 AM PST by TheThirdRuffian (RINOS like Romney, McCain, Christie are sure losers. No more!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson