Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Morgana

I can understand exercising, even to extremes, because that isn’t harmful to the new born as long as care is taken to ensure good care of the mother otherwise.

But to not eat properly when the unborn child would need it the most. That’s wrong.


2 posted on 11/30/2013 6:51:42 AM PST by Jonty30 (What Islam and secularism have in common is that they are both death cults)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Jonty30

Actually exercise is okay, even more so if one was doing it before pregnancy. The problem lies with all these celebs that have flat tummies a month after giving birth. Sometimes sooner. The average woman does not have nannies for the baby, personal trainers and cosmetic surgeons on hand. So they starve themselves to be thin after the baby is born. It’s crazy.


3 posted on 11/30/2013 6:56:32 AM PST by Morgana (Always a bit of truth in dark humor.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Jonty30

And to bring an underweight, probably sickly child into the world? What earthly good does that do for the mother? Dumb broad.


7 posted on 11/30/2013 7:06:49 AM PST by miss marmelstein (Richard Lives Yet!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Jonty30

I had to take it easy with my first pregnancy, and I put on 40 pounds.

Second pregnancy was interesting because I had twins. I was always hungry. It was very primal. I ate so much more the 2nd time, and still only put on 40 pounds. I also couldn’t do much. I was on complete bedrest for over 10 weeks.

It was easy to lose weight after the babies.


16 posted on 11/30/2013 8:21:51 AM PST by luckystarmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson