Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: djf

Yep, JFK was moving in troops by the many thousands, more than 16,000.

At the time, after decades of playing it low key and staying out of war in Vietnam, JFK decided that we suddenly needed 16,000 “advisers”, which is a heck of a lot of advising to be throwing into a war zone.


24 posted on 11/16/2013 11:03:14 PM PST by ansel12 ( Democrats-"a party that since antebellum times has been bent on the dishonoring of humanity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]


To: ansel12
This is weak. JFK definitely ramped up the US involvement in Vietnam.

I've never heard ANYTHING credible that after insertion of a large amount of troops, that he had any intention of calling them back.

LBJ simply continued JFKs ramp up. And had LBJ not royally screwed up, we could have actually WON in Vietnam.

Some have argued that after Tet, that we really had broken the backs of the North Vietnamese.

Don't get me started on my dad's opinion.

He was in the service at the time and has told me many things not considered PC with the Kennedy "legacy".

He STILL hates the guy.

For some reason he blames JFK more than LBJ. And he served under both.

29 posted on 11/16/2013 11:16:05 PM PST by boop (I had no IDEA I'd be paying for Obamacare. I thought it would be a rich guy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson