“I’m not the one advocating summary executions by police officers.”
Neither did I. Again, you say things not in evidence. Your ability at reading comprehension and logical reasoning is retarded at best. You say thing based on emotion and an inability to control yourself.
I said: “I’m not the one advocating summary executions by police officers.”
You said: Neither did I.
So, let’s look at what you did say:
“The cops killed the jackass after he had endangered others and wasn’t stopping.”
“Seems killing the predator was appropriate.”
“With those events in mind, he lost all rights to live IMHO.”
“I believe ALL predators give up their right to live as we have the right to protect ourselves from them and stop them by any means at our disposal.”
I’d say that you have described and advocated what I would call summary execution and you don’t limit it to police officers. If these are not really your opinions, perhaps you ought to clarify.