_____________________________________________________________
1. Police obtained a search warrant based on a false alert by the drug dog.
2. There were X-rays and an anal exam.
3. No drugs were found.
3. He did not consent to these procedures.
4. The search warrant did not cover the county where they took place.
_____________________________________________________________
All of the above claims are easily refutable by police if they're false. Is it your position that police would withhold evidence that refutes the above claims?
Who says that the county is withholding evidence? Has discovery even started?
No I’m certain that they’ll address all of the claims made in the complaint, but they certainly don’t have any obligation to try the case in the media, or to entertain Libertarians on the internet, which seems to be your point, if I understand you correctly.