I’m not a lawyer but this case seems pretty open and shut. The protection of the symbols are clearly meant to prevent impersonation and what this guy is doing falls clearly into the category of “complaining about the government” which is explicitly covered by the 1st amendment.
Beyond that, what he’s doing constitutes parody, which is specifically allowed under the Fair Use provision of copyright law.
” complaining about the government which is explicitly covered by the 1st amendment.”
—
I agree. If you can burn the flag as free speech what this gentleman did should be totally acceptable.
.
At the very least it is political satire which is also protected.
Since the wording on both seals has been altered, doesn’t that obviate the *protection of seals* argument? Those aren’t the official seals.
The criticism is protected free speech, no doubt. The issue is the use of the logos.
For instance, this is from NASA regarding the use of their material:
NASA still images; audio files; video; and computer files used in the rendition of 3-dimensional models, such as texture maps and polygon data in any format, generally are not copyrighted. You may use NASA imagery, video, audio, and data files used for the rendition of 3-dimensional models for educational or informational purposes, including photo collections, textbooks, public exhibits, computer graphical simulations and Internet Web pages. This general permission extends to personal Web pages.My take is this is to prevent someone from giving the impression that NASA endorses their work or opinion, or to prevent someone from impersonating NASA.This general permission does not extend to use of the NASA insignia logo (the blue "meatball" insignia), the retired NASA logotype (the red "worm" logo) and the NASA seal. These images may not be used by persons who are not NASA employees or on products (including Web pages) that are not NASA-sponsored.