[ConorMacNessa]

Doctrines the Courts use to dodge cases too hot to handle:

"Political Question."
"Ripeness."
"Standing to sue."
"Failure to exhaust Administrative Remedies."
"Non-justiciable."
Et cetera, ad nauseam.

America demands Justice for the Fallen of Benghazi!

Genuflectimus non ad principem sed ad Principem Pacis!

Listen, O isles, unto me; and hearken, ye people, from far; The LORD hath called me from the womb; from the bowels of my mother hath he made mention of my name. (Isaiah 49:1 KJV)

[Lurking Libertarian]

Doctrines the Courts use to dodge cases too hot to handle

As they should. "Hot" issues are the ones it is most important to leave to the elected branches of government.

When the liberal judges of the Warren Court sought to get the courts to overrule the President and the Congress on issues like the Vietnam War, it was the conservative justices who pushed back with the doctrines of standing, mootness, political question, exhaustion and the like. And it was good that they succeeded to the extent they did.