Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Crusher138
At the time, agriculture on a large scale was being done by slaves and the south was an agrarian society.

So was the Midwest, but somehow they managed to plant and harvest without slaves.

91 posted on 10/28/2013 3:55:31 PM PDT by Bubba Ho-Tep ("More weight!"--Giles Corey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies ]


To: Bubba Ho-Tep
<So was the Midwest, but somehow they managed to plant and harvest without slaves. /I>

There are high-labor crops, there are low-labor crops.

Indigo, tobacco, cotton are examples of the former; grain crops in general constitute the latter -- while animal forage requires even less labor.

As a rule, the former are better suited to the climatic and soil conditions in the south, while the latter were ideally suited to the Midwest.

In other words, the agricultural Midwest didn't necessarily conscientiously choose to avoid slavery; instead, there was no economic need for it.

93 posted on 10/28/2013 4:22:42 PM PDT by okie01 (The Mainstream Media: Ignorance On Parade)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson