Oh I addressed it. You never caught on nor understood. Are you or have ever been a ‘taker’? I have been, as defined, a ‘taker’ for the last 25+ years. I understand and know ‘takers’ of ALL political stripes. The 36% number, if taken as a solely political philosophical vote, is probably too high. But if taken as a pocketbook issue vote, irregardless of political affiliation, is dead on. Maybe a little low. That ‘ONLY’ thing you questioned is the basis for the whole article. That ONLY thing should scare the crap outta ya. That number is growing and is being nurtured in its growth by government policies. Exponential math dictates an economic end point in the near future because of those policies. If voters continue to support present governing policies then they, the voters, support by default that coming end point. As for ‘ignorance’, well I’ve made a good living and continue to do so off of it........
Then we basically AGREE....but your remain a low information poster...because everything else you mentioned????? I pretty much agreed with the author on that from the get go. Now get off your high horse, shut up and go back and read my entire thread and you'll see that.......