Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: the OlLine Rebel

Evil implies sin and a conscious choice to commit sin, knowing the difference between good and evil.

Animals cannot sin.

They suffer the effects of a fallen world but they do not and can not sin, nor can they be “evil”.

Evil is a choice reserved solely for humans.

[although a cat joyously, slowly and meticulously dismembering some small animal could be said to offer a fair imitation of ‘evil’]


50 posted on 10/25/2013 6:58:20 AM PDT by Salamander (Blue Oyster Cult Will Be The Soundtrack For The Revolution.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]


To: Salamander

Semantics.

When I saw that cat behave the way she did, there is no better word than “evil”. Luckily she wasn’t constantly attacking, though.

As far as the silly mouse-playing thing, now you are projecting your morality on the natural behavior of an animal, and I doubt cats are the only ones. Not that I really care, either. None involved is human.


51 posted on 10/25/2013 7:10:37 AM PDT by the OlLine Rebel (Common sense is an uncommon virtue./Technological progress cannot be legislated.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson