Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: the OlLine Rebel

“Nope, dogs are much more capable of evil.”

Seriously?

“Evil”?

As in premeditated, conscious, intentional EVIL with malice aforethought?

Seriously?


46 posted on 10/25/2013 6:39:53 AM PDT by Salamander (Blue Oyster Cult Will Be The Soundtrack For The Revolution.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]


To: Salamander

Some dogs, yes. If a cat can be naturally evil (well, that might have been the abuse at a tiny age, who knows) so can a dog.

It’s rare, but there. More common are unstable untrustworthy dogs. Some are just incorrigible. And much more dangerous than a cat, at decent sizes.


49 posted on 10/25/2013 6:43:51 AM PDT by the OlLine Rebel (Common sense is an uncommon virtue./Technological progress cannot be legislated.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson