To: The_Victor
Ok, so if the story is public knowledge and a year old, why did Beck feel the need to keep it “close to the vest since before the 2012 election,” why did he wait “for the right time to say what exactly happened,” and why did he give us an incomplete version when he finally did?
36 posted on
10/10/2013 7:04:44 AM PDT by
1rudeboy
To: 1rudeboy
Ok, so if the story is public knowledge and a year old, why did Beck feel the need to keep it “close to the vest since before the 2012 election,” why did he wait “for the right time to say what exactly happened,” and why did he give us an incomplete version when he finally did? You're asking the wrong person. Beck is the only one who can answer that. I was reading over at the Blaze, and came across something that I had not heard about. So I re-posted it here. Maybe he's just trying to spin an old story into gold, I don't know.
37 posted on
10/10/2013 7:09:38 AM PDT by
The_Victor
(If all I want is a warm feeling, I should just wet my pants.)
To: 1rudeboy
Ok, so if the story is public knowledge and a year old, why did Beck feel the need to keep it “close to the vest since before the 2012 election,” why did he wait “for the right time to say what exactly happened,” and why did he give us an incomplete version when he finally did? He is very weird that way. He revealed info about an Oval Office meeting he had with George W. Bush in 2007 just this past June.
42 posted on
10/10/2013 7:23:57 AM PDT by
montag813
(NO AMNESTY * ENFORCE THE LAW * http://StandWithArizona.com)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson