Posted on 10/01/2013 11:22:25 AM PDT by Morgana
A wanker satisfied with his lot.
40 years ago most 14 year old’s had access to Playboy, etc.
Most boys will find porn on the internet - hard to imagine otherwise.
"Hey, mates, you should have seen it! This stupid old fart was asking me a bunch of questions about porn, so I made up all kinds of crazy stuff until I thought he was going to pass out stone cold on the floor! It was the most hilarious thing ever!"
Radical Feminists are pleased. That means those boys aren’t out trying to court a girl. Get married and start having those filthy children!
40 years ago boys had to seek out porn, now porn seeks out boys on the internet. Think about it. 40 years ago one had to leave the house and go buy a playboy, now with a few keystrokes some times by accident one can find porn with ease.
So you think porn isn’t as widely spread as this article indicates?
The welfare state gives a huge swath of young men a life of dependency in which the idea of having a decent job, getting married, having a home, and raising a family is reduced to a fantasy. Hence porn becomes their reality.
The immaturity of so many supposed adults who post to these threads is depressing.
“Radical Feminists are pleased”
So are the makers of Viagra. This means their sales will triple among 20 something year old’s.
“The immaturity of so many supposed adults who post to these threads is depressing.”
Immaturity or closet porn lovers?
Most of the time, if memory serves, one might have had a friend with a dad or older brother who procured the materials. Just like sneaking into a parent’s liquor cabinet.
But I agree - its much easier on the internet.
And Playboy was pretty mild compared to the stuff these kids are talking about.
(But at least NOW you know who thinks up fake p****’s)!
However, this ONOZ OMG hair-on-fire stuff is nonsense, fed by teenage boys who, handed a golden opportunity to amuse themselves at some old fogey's expense, take full advantage.
Ahh so 97% of teenage boys haven’t viewed porn?
Porn doesn’t damage peoples real relationships?
ahhh ok, perhaps you have some proof???
The queers are happy about it, too, because they can recruit from those disaffected teen boys for their next generation of perverts.
“And Playboy was pretty mild compared to the stuff these kids are talking about.”
Mild? Listen so some of Dr. Judith Reisman’s lectures on Playboy. You have no idea how dangerous Playboy has been all these years. Dr. Reisman has videos all over youtube or you may go here:
http://www.drjudithreisman.com/
Proof of what? You haven’t made any positive assertions.
Has the good doctor won any judgments in her lawsuits against imams using the exact same rhetoric to denounce trollops who show their faces in public?
(I'm assuming that the imams copied the rhetoric from her, rather than vice versa.)
“Has the good doctor won any judgments in her lawsuits “
http://www.drjudithreisman.com/reisman_won_playboy_libel_suit.html
Playboy Lost to Reisman!
Reisman Child Porn Study Defeats Playboy’s Dutch Libel Suit
In 1994, Playboy sued Dutch tv broadcaster EO to demand the retraction of statements by Dr. Reisman in one of their broadcasts. On air, Reisman essentially accused Playboy of producing child pornography, based on the study of three decades of its publications. Playboy ultimately lost the lawsuit.
First time I accidentally found porn was when hubby told me to pull up Pep Boys auto parts site. I’d never heard of the company and couldn’t understand what “pet” boys had to do with tires. He hasn’t let me live that down.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.