Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 09/22/2013 6:56:30 PM PDT by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Olog-hai

If someone wants to go through all that trouble to hack my iPhone, I’ve got more problems than I know.


2 posted on 09/22/2013 6:57:20 PM PDT by RIghtwardHo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Olog-hai

3 posted on 09/22/2013 6:59:17 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (You can't invade the mainland US There'd be a rifle behind every blade of grass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Olog-hai

The easiest “hack” would be to hack off the finger when you stole the phone.


8 posted on 09/22/2013 7:32:20 PM PDT by NonValueAdded (Henceforth, the Office of the President shall be known as IMPOTUS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Olog-hai

Um, the iPhone’s screen will be covered with the fingerprint that unlocks it - I would guess that 99% of owners would use the thumb or index finger of his dominant hand as his security print.


10 posted on 09/22/2013 7:41:52 PM PDT by wideawake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Olog-hai

Ok this is complete liberal media inspired and/or google BS. The so called hacking scenario calls for three of the following to be present for it to work
1. a stolen iPhone
2. a stolen fingerprint
3. An owner who is incapacited in some way, tied up or maybe dead. Which unless I’m wrong would change this scenario entirely.


14 posted on 09/22/2013 8:23:37 PM PDT by o2bfree (Lindsey Graham is left of South Carolina.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Olog-hai
"Apple’s advanced fingerprint technology is hacked; should you worry?"

Not worried a bit. The last time I bought and Apple Product, Reagan was in the White House.

15 posted on 09/22/2013 8:32:14 PM PDT by Mad Dawgg (If you're going to deny my 1st Amendment rights then I must proceed to the 2nd one...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Olog-hai

The bottom line with finger print technology was pointed out by people like Bill Gates a long time ago. Internally a fingerprint is represented by something like a Guid or large integer value. Once they have that, since it will never change, they own you. Passwords can be changed and perhaps fingerprint GUIDs can be reestablished, but except for low-level operations it is a bad security model.


17 posted on 09/22/2013 10:03:57 PM PDT by microgood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Olog-hai

As weirded out as I am at the idea of this fingerprint scanner even existing (though I know they’ve been around for a while, even on early 2000s HP laptops), what damage could really be done by having someone’s fingerprint? I can’t think of anything, at least not anything that actually exists and isn’t still the stuff of futuristic science fiction.

The government already has my fingerprints from when I started working as a day camp counselor when I was 14. Quite a bummer; there were so many murders that I wanted to get away with.


18 posted on 09/23/2013 12:29:51 AM PDT by pregnant-cornbread
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson