Again, this thread is not about homosexuality or if Bond is a muslim. I think Boyd misses Fleming point in "Live and Let Die".
1 posted on
09/22/2013 8:55:07 AM PDT by
Perdogg
To: SilvieWaldorfMD; GSP.FAN; Young Werther; Guenevere; SJSAMPLE; Larry Lucido; fieldmarshaldj; ...
2 posted on
09/22/2013 8:57:52 AM PDT by
Perdogg
(Cruz-Paul 2016)
To: Perdogg
3 posted on
09/22/2013 9:00:42 AM PDT by
Hardraade
(http://junipersec.wordpress.com (Obama: the bearded lady of the Muslim Brotherhood))
To: Perdogg
I think if you were of that privileged upper class, born at the beginning of the 20th century, you were probably racist, sexist, right wing and anti-Semitic.'
Fixed.
4 posted on
09/22/2013 9:02:23 AM PDT by
Bratch
To: Perdogg
His new Bond novel is set in the year 1969, so he’s imposing modern-day PC values on a half-century old version of James Bond. Laughable.
6 posted on
09/22/2013 9:03:39 AM PDT by
Kip Russell
(Be wary of strong drink. It can make you shoot at tax collectors -- and miss. ---Robert A. Heinlein)
To: Perdogg
This arrogant idiot couldn’t shine Fleming’s shoes.
7 posted on
09/22/2013 9:07:51 AM PDT by
headstamp 2
(What would Scooby do?)
To: Perdogg
I gave you a green arrow. :)
9 posted on
09/22/2013 9:14:38 AM PDT by
LostInBayport
(When there are more people riding in the cart than there are pulling it, the cart stops moving...)
To: Perdogg
And what exactly is wrong with being right wing ? He sounds like an arrogant elitist PC asshole.
To: Perdogg
I think Boyd is using his own contemporary artistically leftist standards to judge Fleming while attempting to justify his own, apparently denigrated, version of "Bond".
IOW, Boyd's a critical deconstructionist.
To: Perdogg
If Ian Flemming is so bad, why is he standing on his shoulders? Bond is already created, he only has to send him on another adventure and he’s complaining about the source material??
Is he another 60’s idiot now with power?
14 posted on
09/22/2013 9:34:19 AM PDT by
Lx
(Do you like it? Do you like it, Scott? I call it, "Mr. & Mrs. Tenorman Chili.")
To: Perdogg
Ian Fleming 'was sexist, racist and sadistic'
Aaaand loving it!
16 posted on
09/22/2013 9:35:30 AM PDT by
BenLurkin
(This is not a statemet of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both.)
To: Perdogg
Ian Fleming 'was sexist, racist and sadistic': New Bond author says his book is well-written... unlike the originals Talk about biting the hand that feeds you. Fleming was wildly successful, and this author is using that success for his own book, yet insulting the very books Fleming wrote. Ingratitude, they name is liberal.
21 posted on
09/22/2013 9:57:45 AM PDT by
Flick Lives
(We're going to be just like the old Soviet Union, but with free cell phones!)
To: Perdogg
Guess I know which author I will be avoiding. Had all of the originals at one time.
22 posted on
09/22/2013 9:58:12 AM PDT by
MamaB
To: Perdogg
Well, I guess Bond has been neutered even more
I never knew Bond as racist. And, yes, he was already quite “diverse” with his women in Live and Let Die
23 posted on
09/22/2013 10:04:21 AM PDT by
SeminoleCounty
(Supporting Communism is never Conservatism)
To: Perdogg
feh...
25 posted on
09/22/2013 10:18:47 AM PDT by
Chode
(Stand UP and Be Counted, or line up and be numbered - *DTOM* -vvv- NO Pity for the LAZY)
To: Perdogg
The Cold War is over, and so the entire idea of a recherche thug being one of the good guys is uncomfortable for the PC mindset.
If the author wanted to capture the spirit of Bond, his hero would be shooting Muslim terrorists. In the back. And it would be a good thing.
To: Perdogg
Not really surprising, is it? Whatever your political or ideological affiliation, if you were one of Fleming's peers or contemporaries you probably didn't have views that would be regarded as politically correct nowadays. Future generations will probably find fault with today's trendy, well-to-do Britons like Boyd for some reason that may not be clear to us now.
It all does seem like "poor form," though. Taking the Bond job is something like an admission that a writer hasn't made it as a highbrow author -- that you're only at best a middlebrow and not a very creative or original one. Tacking your name onto Fleming's and Bond's for the money is bad enough, but angling for extra publicity by running down the franchise and its creator is definitely base and boorish.
29 posted on
09/22/2013 11:30:16 AM PDT by
x
To: Perdogg
Was
CHITTY CHITTY BANG BANG
sexist?
Now that's a Bond Caar!
30 posted on
09/22/2013 11:32:26 AM PDT by
Young Werther
(Julius Caesar said "Quae cum ita sunt. Since these things are so.".)
To: Perdogg
William Boyd, the third writer in recent years to pen a new installment to the classic spy series. What a horrible way to start.
Announce your "political Correctness," and be assured I will never read anything you write, moron!
And just for grins, I must add the obvious. YOU don't get to judge whether your writing is 'better.' Your readers do.
Maybe you need some time at a "Delusional' clinic.
32 posted on
09/22/2013 12:56:00 PM PDT by
publius911
(Look for the Union label, then buy something else.)
To: Perdogg; Revolting cat!
More PussCyfying of mass media escapist “trash” pulp books and movies.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson