Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Wyrd bið ful aræd

Thank you for confirming your willingness to dispatch an animal with a *non-mortal* wound.

I’m sure there are plenty of Obamacare enthusiasts who will be equally eager to get rid of wounded/sick “undesirables” who, would proper treatment, also would live.

We have to keep healthcare expenses down, you know.


39 posted on 09/17/2013 8:13:35 PM PDT by Altariel ("Curse your sudden but inevitable betrayal!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]


To: Altariel
Yes, if an animal is injured enough to warrant medical care, which no one can foot the bill for, then the simplest thing is to mercifully dispatch it. Unless you want another government program to patch up every injured stray they find, at our expense. You sound like you'd be happy with government funded universal veterinary care.

As for the rest of your argument, its apples and oranges. Animals are not people, and euthanizing stray animals cannot be compared in any way to the government forcibly euthanizing human beings.

45 posted on 09/19/2013 5:06:45 AM PDT by Wyrd bið ful aræd (Gone Galt, 11/07/12----No king but Christ! Don't tread on me!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson