Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: quimby

I understand your post, but I think you are missing what I believe the intent of this thread was - to draw attention to the “rest of the story”... That being that Apple is making a big deal out of a new chip that is 64-bit, and could (by their statement - “desktop-class architecture” be a hint at bigger things coming. Could Apple be angling to go back to hands-on design of their own CPU’s for their entire product line? Remember, Apple moved away from ARM for their computer offerings (previously the result of Motorola + Apple partnership) because the ARM tech was not keeping up (particularly in the raw numbers category) with the Intel-type processors. Clock speeds and advances in general had slowed considerably with the PowerPC line, which led to marking issues, as well as parts availability (and cost) issues, and more. So Apple jumped to the Intel CPU and has done well with it.

BUT - it would be very Apple-like to jump back to their own proprietary chips. I’m not sure its a good idea (other than it sure would simplify OS and cross-device development in their product lines!

Still - I’m not sure I am thrilled with that idea. But it is definitely news and note-worthy.


33 posted on 09/12/2013 8:46:11 AM PDT by TheBattman (Isn't the lesser evil... still evil?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]


To: TheBattman
....Clock speeds and advances in general had slowed considerably with the PowerPC line....

If I recall my ancient history correctly, Apple abandoned the PowerPC partly because the manufacturers had slowed down deliveries to Apple in favor of DoD contracts.

The PowerPC processor was used in U.S smart weapons for years.

34 posted on 09/12/2013 10:06:42 AM PDT by jimtorr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson