Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: traditional1

“Won’t be long before an ambulance-chaser starts the “pain and suffering, loss of sleep, mental anguish, loss of consortium, etc” arguments to get into the DEEP pockets of Zuckerman......”

This is strictly a property damage claim so that stuff won’t work. Now if she had been in the car when it was hit then your scenario works.


12 posted on 09/09/2013 4:38:11 PM PDT by Stormdog (A rifle transforms one from subject to Citizen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: Stormdog
"This is strictly a property damage claim so that stuff won’t work."

LOL

When there's potentially THAT much money to pursue, she "loved that car, and it was her 'baby'...." "She can't sleep at night because she has nightmares about her beautiful dream car...."

In the REAL world of Litigation Lotto today, it doesn't matter if common sense tells you it's a no-brainer; today, just get it in front of a Jury that is thinking "he can afford it!", and all bets are OFF!

17 posted on 09/09/2013 5:06:15 PM PDT by traditional1 (Amerika.....Providing public housing for the Mulatto Messiah)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson