Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Chickensoup

“... box is not intended to store...” sounds to me like an informational warning - we didn’t put this box to store money, not that it can’t but it isn’t INTENDED to. sounds to me like if the box gets compromised, that they’re covering themselves from damages (I had a million dollars in there!)


8 posted on 09/09/2013 10:04:56 AM PDT by camle (keep an open mind and someone will fill it full of something for you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: camle

Yeah, that’s what it sounds like to me. If it was some new government regulation, we’d all be hearing about it, so it’s probably just the bank covering its patootie.


12 posted on 09/09/2013 10:09:20 AM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: camle

Unless case law has changed, banks have never been liable for losses from a safety deposit box.


19 posted on 09/09/2013 10:22:12 AM PDT by SampleMan (Feral Humans are the refuse of socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: camle

Agree but I don’t think that safe deposit boxes in the bank, any bank, insured at all. Enter at your own risk.


51 posted on 09/09/2013 11:35:15 AM PDT by QQQQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: camle

Exactly. When you go to your box and the money is gone they will simply shrug and say — “We told you not to put it there.”


55 posted on 09/09/2013 12:36:05 PM PDT by BenLurkin (This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson