No the USC has not changed. But the Interpretation seems to have disappeared.
That is not tinfoil. It may be that it is being “revised”, but I also found no trace of that on the Thomas.gov site.
Thomas generally has the law, but I do not remember references to “Interpretation” of the law.
I can assure you that distrust of the reporting of new public legislation is not tin foil hat stuff. I have seen with my own eyes attempts to hide the actual votes by reading the bill into the number of an existing bill, making it almost impossible to track. In one case the only place I could find the text of the law was at the government printing office. That one was no accident. My own congressman could not find the text. He later emailed me the link to the GPO, which I had already found. Pure stealth legislation.
Our Congress critters are not to be trusted. Ever. Yes, there are exceptions, but they are few.
website opinions are not law.
we still have law professors spewing colectivism on secon amendment civil rights regardless of the supreme court.