To: nickcarraway
The U-2 was certainly useful, but was not a success at photographing the USSR, as Gary Powers discovered. Only satellites were successful at that.
16 posted on
08/31/2013 12:36:52 AM PDT by
iowamark
(I must study politics and war that my sons may have liberty to study mathematics and philosophy)
To: iowamark
You take one loss in 50 years and dis the program?
18 posted on
08/31/2013 12:42:32 AM PDT by
mylife
(Ted Cruz understands the law, and he does not fear the unlawful.)
To: iowamark
Satellites are on a fixed pattern.
19 posted on
08/31/2013 12:44:58 AM PDT by
mylife
(Ted Cruz understands the law, and he does not fear the unlawful.)
To: iowamark
The black and white photographic negatives produced by the U-2's advanced telescopic cameras were such fine grain that they could be examined by highly trained specialists using microscopes. I think they got some great resolution from those negatives. The 5000 feet of film weighed 300 lbs and had to be spooled from opposite directions to balance the aircraft. Each spool had a negative 9 inches wide that fed into the lens image. The combined image was 18 inches square! This enabled images with a resolution of 2.5 feet from 65,000 feet. That resolution is better than today's drones.
The camera:

Another element was thermal scanning. I am not sure if the U-2 had the same type of thermal imaging equipment as the SR-71 Black Bird. I was told that the capabilities of that equipment was stunning. In later years they used it to locate the position of buried bodies by a serial killer.
23 posted on
08/31/2013 3:01:51 AM PDT by
jonrick46
(The opium of Communists: other people's money.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson