Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Charles Martel

And you correct about the “old” mash usage...That is not the case with pure bourbon..It uses only “new” corn mash in it’s distilling processes...Then it is cased in wooden barrels for aging...Sour mash is filtered through ash charcoal before being stored in wooden barrels...


27 posted on 08/22/2013 12:30:00 PM PDT by Boonie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]


To: All

There is a distinct taste difference between bourbon and sour mash...There is a distinct taste difference between rye and bourbon and sour mash.
Pure Canadian rye whiskey is probably the smoothest whiskey ever...


28 posted on 08/22/2013 12:32:12 PM PDT by Boonie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

To: Boonie
...about the “old” mash usage...That is not the case with pure bourbon..It uses only “new” corn mash in it’s distilling processes...

Take a look at the Buffalo Trace website. You'll find a video there about the fermenting process which mentions use of "setback" from a previous batch to start the sour-mash process. Since those guys not only make their own name brand, but also the super-popular straight bourbons sold under the George T. Stagg and Pappy Van Winkle names, I'd say they're representative of how the big "pure" bourbon distillers operate.

Also, look up some of the online scotch reviewers (Ralfy Mitchell, for starters). They're always ranting about the ills of chill-filtration (which sort of does the same thing to scotch that the charcoal-filtering process does to Tennessee whiskey - it sucks part of the flavor out).

30 posted on 08/22/2013 1:34:05 PM PDT by Charles Martel (Endeavor to persevere...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson