They now say that the two were on the road 20 hours before the fire and that "the photograph was further evidence that the fires were set after DiMaggio fled the area" -- implying that there was a 3rd party -- but they want to shut it down.
Now the cheerleading practice was August 3rd not August 4th and it took them this long to find that out -- but they want to shut it down.
Now about those 13 phone calls just before both phones shut off at 4:00: Is that still 4:00 on August 4th or have they now switched those calls to August 3rd as well???
If they are both in the car together on August 4th then why would they need to be calling each other on the phone -- unless there was distance and space between them meaning that she could have easily called 911 at any of those times but she didn't.
As they struggle to come up with a timeline, an explanation of what they mean by "torture", an explanation of the crime scene, the relationship between DiMaggio and Hannah, and whether a 3rd party was involved, we get this from the police:
Caldwell said Tuesday that detectives now are working to "close the book" on the case. Our investigation is winding down, and we hope that the attention does as well....
Really -- shut it down -- are they admitting that they have blown the investigation???
Have they interviewed the cat???
He coulda looped back.
I thought I read there was evidence of timer incendiary devices.
There are a number of things in this case that just don’t seem to add up.
I’ve been curious about the details from the beginning. I just hate that I wonder so much about Hannah’s involvement. I really, really hope she wasn’t involved.
He could have done all this on his own, like kill them first, then set a timed fire starter device. But where was she during the killings?
A little off topic, but was the cat found & rescued too? I read that the riders who reported Hannah & the kidnappers also saw a gray cat at the campsite. They thought it wd attract wolves. I admit I’ve been wondering if it was left behind in the wilderness & got eaten. Do you know if it’s okay?
5.56mm
And whee, checkpoint photography... Millions of cars and innocent people photographed so that they could have this piece of evidence..
Big Brother is watching...
This rates a ‘So What?’
That he was with the girl 20 hours before the fire just means he was with her 20 hours before the fire. It doesn’t mean they were ‘already on the run’.
Something is VERY fishy about Hannah’s relationship with the dead guy!
It’s like that airline pilot - Sum Ting Wong.
I think in this case as in all others you need to look for motive.
It seems to me that the dead perp had the LEAST motive. Way ahead of him would be the dead woman’s husband and the Girl.
Husband kill wives and daughters kill mothers. If the perp could leave with Hanna and disappear, what would be his motive for killing the mother and the kid? I see none, or at least a very flimsy one.
And why the “torture”? There would have to be a motive for that too. It doesn’t make sense that the “perp” did it. Now he may have covered for the girl after the fact I guess.
My first guess would be the father, second would be Hanna that did the killing.
And BTW, there was more age difference between Clinton and liwinski than there was between the perp and Hanna...
I’m beginning to wonder if that girl was in on this.